On the fourth of July, Paula S. Kirby tweeted this:
(formated for better readability, original below):
Last year one of the Oppressed Sisters described women in the atheist movement who don't take the RadFem view as 'house-slaves'. 1/3
Strangely, no one attacked her for the term on the basis that we weren't actually flogged for failing to polish the doorstep properly ...2/3
... or that using slavery as an analogy was disrespectful to its victims. 3/3
Paula Kirby @PaulaSKirby
... or that using slavery as an analogy was disrespectful to its victims. 3/3
3 Kommentare:
I'm wondering if Ms. Kirby meant this comment by Talisma Nasarin:
http://freethoughtblogs.com/taslima/2012/04/09/sexual-slavery-must-be-abolished/#comment-266
If so then she actually was refuted by her commenters. However I'm not sure that any of the bloggers at FTB saw that comment or if they did see it, say anything about it.
Thank you for the link. Absolutely possible that this is what she meant, but it proves her further dishonesty
The attacks have been ramping up. It seems the only people they can get to listen are "I'm not a mysoginist, my best friend is a woman" How long before their whinging dies down? Why hold a grudge against the people or supposed hypocrisy rather than addressing the issue: all people should feel safe with the assurance of guidelines for their safety - and all people should feel free to operate as they normally have for the past few years when it comes to consensual activities. Seriously, I just don't see what's unreasonable about that. Without the personal assaults they would have nothing of substance to add to the "debate" (WHY IS IT EVEN A DEBATE GAH!)
On a better note: Happy belated birthday to your daughterspawn!
Kommentar veröffentlichen